Source: Time Magazine,
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1713335,00.htmlProvided by: Sng Sze Ying
Thursday, Feb. 14, 2008
Smoke and Mirrors
By Bill Powell/ShanghaiNo country except the U.S. is crawling with more venture capitalists looking to fund green-energy deals these days than China. The rush has not yet reached dotcom-boom proportions, but VCs and entrepreneurs see big opportunities in helping the country cope with its horrendous pollution problems through alternative-energy development. Deals are getting done. China is applying green principles to the construction of entirely new cities such as Dongtan, an area outside of Shanghai the size of Manhattan, which will use recycled water only and generate electricity using biomass. Last year, 3.4 gigawatts (GW) of wind energy were added to China's electrical grid, making the country the fastest-growing market for wind power in the world. And by 2020, China will quadruple its nuclear capacity from 10 GW to 40, again the fastest rate of growth globally.
But to anyone laboring under the impression that China is well on its way to a carbon-neutral future, reality can be sobering. Despite progress on the alternative-energy front, demand for power is expanding at such an extraordinary rate that it can only be satisfied by the combustion of vast additional quantities of coal, oil and natural gas. For example, between 2008 and 2030, the incremental increase in China's consumption of oil alone is expected to equal India's total annual oil consumption today, according to the International Energy Agency. "The government is being very aggressive in its pursuit of hydro, nuclear and renewables," says Jone-Lin Wang, a senior director at Cambridge Energy Research Associates (CERA), a U.S. energy consultancy. "But overall you're not really moving the dial that much over the next 10 to 20 years. These things take time."
Time is not on China's side. The government has announced plans to add an astonishing 1,300 GW to its electrical generation capacity by 2020. (The U.S. is currently capable of generating 1,000 GW.) The goal is for 25-30% of this to come from clean and renewable technologies. But even if these ambitious targets are achieved, some 70% of China's electricity will still come from coal-fired plants in 2020. That's down from about 78% today.
One reason China is so power-hungry: beginning in 2002, the country began dramatically expanding its heavy industries such as steel and aluminum production and auto manufacturing — capital-intensive businesses that are huge energy hogs. Five years ago, the ratio of heavy industry output to gdp in China was 55%; that rose to a staggering 120% last year. Today, light and heavy industry accounts for nearly three-quarters of the country's energy use. As a result, China is not a particularly efficient consumer of power, lagging well behind Japan, the U.S. and other developed countries in the amount of economic output it generates for every gigawatt consumed. Hoping to become 20% more energy-efficient over the next 12 years, Beijing in 2006 ordered heavy industries and local officials to develop more judicious consumption strategies. The government also increased pressure on provincial governments to enact strict building codes to make new office buildings and shopping centers less wasteful.
Laudable moves, but there's another reason why China is becoming as addicted to hydrocarbons as the U.S.: the middle-class dream is coming true for tens of millions of mainlanders, who are buying their first cars, computers, clothes dryers and other electrical appliances. Some estimate that China last year surpassed the U.S. as the largest producer of the greenhouse gases that cause global warming, yet the impact of the country's growing consumerism has barely started to spread across the world's energy and environmental landscape. To put matters into perspective, consider China's massive Three Gorges Dam, a $29 billion project that displaced millions of peasants in return for a big jolt of clean, affordable hydropower. According to a forecast by policymakers at Beijing's Sustainable Energy Program, electricity demand from air-conditioners purchased by Chinese in 2008 alone will exceed the total capacity of Three Gorges Dam.
Air-conditioners? What if 300 million Chinese decide to buy suvs? "The Chinese are sort of like the Americans," says CERA's Wang. "They like big cars and houses." That's an observation likely to darken the outlook of even the sunniest of solar-power advocates, and knock the wind right out of the sails of wind-power fans. No matter how much China invests in green technologies, it looks like it won't be enough.
My Comments: I think China's efforts to cut pollution is reasonably commendable and successful for a country that is living beyond its own means. Yet due to several reasons, China has and will become the victim of its own success, as these environmental policies can have several impacts on the chinese society. Socially, the lives of the common people are in one way or another affected by China's plans to improve environmental conditions. Large-scale projects like The Three Gorges Dam is one good example to show that while it is a generally successful one for generating "cheap and affordable hydropower", it was done at the expense of the welfare and interests of the local people who lived near the dam. In a society where it is susceptible to social unrests, the forced displacement can easily incur the people's wrath and spark social upheavals that is detrimental to not only the social stability, but also to both the economic and political stability of the country as well. While efforts are aimed at solving environmental issues plagueing China, social problems like this will inevitably result and have a snowballing effect. Also, the effectiveness of China's plan to tighten regulations and enforce stricter rules on building codes to make office buildings and shopping centres more environmental friendly, remains to be seen and observed. Although on the surface level, "the government increased pressures on provincial governments" to enact these stringent rules, there is still uncertainty in whether this would work. After all, there is often a lack of political will amongst the provincial governments to prioritize environmental protection efforts over economic prosperity. Presently the provincial government are already running into deficit in funds for economic and social development of their respective provinces, hence there is less likely a chance that more funds will be given to them to invest in expensive green technology. Even if they do recieve funds from the government or earn enough from investments to fund these projects, corrupted provincial governments would not put this money into good use. Therefore, I agree with the author's stance that, "no matter how much China invests in green technogies, it looks like it won't be enough.".Labels: air pollution, China's Environmental Issues, posted by Sze Ying
1 comments | comment?
